Cut or uncut?

@*******one: well, the female point of view was actually asked for in the original post, so I see no harm in you joining the discussion

@*******n74 @***ym I feel that there is a rather large difference between removing some skin that has no (huge) impact on sexual pleasure or health (if done correctly) and removing the sole body part that's responsible for feeling sexual pleasure entirely, including the obvious impact of not feeling that same pleasure for lack of the necessary body part".

Focusing on age and medical details of the procedure would suffice if "female circumcision" meant removing of the clitoral hood. But it does not, so all comparisons are kinda moot to begin with.
Comparing female circumcision to castration is more suitable (tough again not the same, as in this case castration usually also means losing the ability to procreate entirely).

Hm? I wasn't replying to THAT post, but to your other one starting with "With due respect to easyrider21,". I did not find any other post with that content that you might have quoted. That's your text, isn't it?

I'm also totally ok with females joining the debate, no problem there. I'm just not to keen on people without penises or foreskin explaining those that have one how it works.
In this parcttcular case, you stating that sensitivity is not impacted by circumscision, despite peopel who actually know stating the difference. Like, how would you know?

@*****alS: fair and valid point and agreed. An aspect I oversaw, hence the word mutilation.

well now... that escalated a bit.

let take a step back and re-access.
FGM is not the topic.

@*******one
I can only assume that you ment "I am use to always having", as you physically can't really have a penis and be a woman.

technically you could, but the previous owner might not be very delighted about the situation

what I do take from the rest of your remarks, taking some Grammer mistakes into account, is that you found circumcised men last longer, and that most likely from your perspective there is no real difference for the woman. Forskin or not...

Slightly bumpy way of getting to the point, but never the less.

@*****eld thanks for sharing

in hindsight I must say that even though I did not really perceive this topic to be a issue in Europe, I guess I stand corrected.

@*********igolo I would like to change my Answer then to option
B :
circumcision still plays a role with most immigrated Germans, as for the rest of Europe...

Maybe you can tell us the Italian attitude

OMG! Some of you men got your pussy hurt!. Calm the fuck down. 🤣

Everyone has the right to share their opinion here. No need to get outraged and insulted. Leave that kind of degradation to an experienced Domme 😈

I was honestly thinking this was a post asking women which they prefer on a lover but based on the words of those born with a penis, they don’t want to know. 😂😂😂

thanks for mansplaining to the men who were mansplaining.

@*********igolo You are a very cheeky person. I think it's funny, in a Jackass sort of way. Sort of sorry but not really because I'm a sadistic bitch from the Bronx. 😎

💋❤️ CT in the house.

cut

personally, I don't see male circumcision as barbaric. I recall no harm from the procedure, and am quite happy with the result, and have always been. Unlike FGM (which is totally fucked up), male circumcision does not interfere with sexual pleasure, and maybe simplifies hygiene

I like to look penis of men all kind. My cock is circumsized.

cut

Cut.

“Uncut”

Isa

let's be honest. if you cut something on a female body it's called genital mutilation.
that's what it is..male or female